Case study
Ireland → Iceland — woodchip supply-chain diligence
Assessment of Irish sawmill residuals for an Icelandic carbon-removal feedstock pathway, covering supplier origination, port selection, shipping class economics, GHG footprinting, phytosanitary limits and scale-up options.

Challenge
Test whether Ireland could supply low-bark woodchip into an Icelandic carbon-removal feedstock pathway at meaningful scale, while satisfying technical specification, plant-health, sustainability, port, shipping and GHG requirements.
What we did
- Identified 58 potential Irish wood-fibre suppliers across sawmills, forestry service firms, harvesting firms and chipping operators.
- Held face-to-face meetings with 12 sawmills representing the majority of Irish sawmilling output.
- Assessed sawmill residuals, forestry-service material and pulp-log pathways against bark-content, cost and GHG constraints.
- Compared Irish port options including Galway, Foynes, Greenore, Passage West, Rushbrooke and others.
- Modelled road haulage, port handling, ocean shipping and delivered GHG footprint to Iceland.
- Reviewed sustainability certification and phytosanitary requirements for Icelandic import.
- Developed scale-up logic for moving from small coaster shipments toward larger, lower-cost bulk movements.

Key results
- Confirmed that Irish sawmill residuals could meet the low-bark requirement more readily than chipped pulp logs.
- Showed that small coaster shipments created a major delivered-cost and GHG penalty.
- Identified larger Handy-sized shipments and suitable bulk ports as the better Phase 2 pathway.
- Highlighted the value of reducing unnecessary movement of wet wood fibre.
- Created a practical supplier, port and GHG decision framework for an Ireland-to-Iceland biomass pathway.
Outcome
A grounded supply-chain blueprint for low-bark Irish woodchip into Iceland: supplier base, port choices, shipping constraints, GHG footprint, phytosanitary route and scale-up logic. The work separated near-term supply complexity from longer-term practical routes and showed where the pathway could be made more efficient before procurement or investment decisions were taken.